Home / Solutions

Industrial Scenario Solutions

AI + Manufacturing

AI transformation in manufacturing is not handing employees tools — it is rebuilding the value creation process. First let AI understand how the enterprise runs, then let it finish the work inside the rules.

Why Most Manufacturing AI Delivers No Value

These are not problems of model capability. They are problems of AI never being placed inside the enterprise's value creation mechanism.

01

Bottom-Up Emergence

Employees using AI tools on their own produce only local efficiency; organizational productivity comes from process, takt and collaboration — it does not emerge on its own.

02

Wishful ROI

Asking directly for lower cost, higher efficiency and fewer people without breaking out the mechanism that produces the result — outcome metrics are no substitute for an improvement path.

03

Blocked by Dirty Data

When requirements, drawings, changes, BOM and cost data are not connected, AI Q&A stalls at the demo and never reaches production.

04

AI That Only Talks

Summarizing documents, answering questions and generating reports are not the core value of manufacturing. Value appears when a process is advanced and a system is actually called.

05

Does Not Understand How the Enterprise Executes

Without defined processes, objects, states, roles, rules and inputs and outputs, AI can only guess the business from prompts.

06

Demo-Grade Validation

Only the effect is validated — not permission constraints, system calls, exception handling, state transitions or traceable records.

07

Bypassing the Management System

AI should strengthen the management instruments — people, process, systems and rules — not leave every front-line team to experiment on its own.

Three Threads: Model, Execute, Use Data

Not train a model first, and not write interface scripts first — first build the enterprise's business semantics into an executable foundation, then let AI accumulate data through real execution.

First Thread

Business Model Toolkit

Built Once

Turn business objects, processes, rules, roles, permissions and gates into a foundation AI can understand, execute and verify — and accumulate it as a reusable asset.

Second Thread

AI for DATA

Into the Execution Front Line

Let AI create, verify, connect and accumulate data during real business execution, instead of waiting for the data to be cleaned first.

Third Thread

DATA for AI

Use Existing Data to Support Judgement

While executing, AI queries, extracts and matches information already held in enterprise systems and data lakes, providing the basis for classification, de-duplication, gap-filling and explanation.

Five Validated Solution Paths

From the R&D data thread to quality closure, early process involvement, design reuse and organizational capability — every path has been run in real production.

R&D Data Thread AI+PLM

AI+PLM

Turn complex system operations into conversational business execution

For high-frequency, complex, cross-role and cross-system R&D data operations. Users state intent and confirm key decisions in one place; AI completes the rest under control — creating objects, filling fields, pushing approvals and syncing across systems.

Scenarios Covered

Material & Master DataDrawings & DocumentsBOM StructureEngineering ChangeRelease & KittingSupplier CollaborationDesign Reuse

Customer Outcomes

Fewer System SwitchesFewer Fields to FillLess Approval ChasingFull Traceability
Quality Closed Loop AI+Quality

AI + Issue-to-FMEA Closed Loop

Send quality problems back where they belong — into design and specifications

Put the issue, root cause, action, experiment, specification and FMEA into one governed flow. AI extracts evidence along the flow, structures the root-cause analysis, drafts actions, triggers expert confirmation, and writes conclusions back into the FMEA and design specifications.

Scenarios Covered

Issue ClassificationRoot Cause AnalysisAction DefinitionExperiment & ValidationFMEA UpdateSpecification Check

Customer Outcomes

Early Risk Warning on New DesignsFMEA Pre-fillTraceable Root CausesExperience Becomes Reusable
Early Process & Purchasing Involvement AI+Concurrent

AI + Concurrent Engineering

Move process and purchasing from post-review into the design process

Using the product structure under development as a shared skeleton, process engineering builds the routing in parallel and purchasing builds the cost model in parallel. Specialists come in earlier, and change impact becomes visible during design.

Scenarios Covered

Development BOMDesign Specification PartsProcess RoutingRFQ & Cost ModelManufacturability FeedbackEngineering-to-Manufacturing BOM Handover

Customer Outcomes

Specialists Brought in EarlierCost Visible EarlyChange Impact Under ControlComplete Collaboration Trail
Design Reuse AI+Modular

AI + Modularity

From customer requirements to proven modules — recommendations with reasons

Reasoning across the requirement, function, logic and physical layers: historical data is first rebuilt into a reason-able digital thread, then available modules are recommended against interface rules, maturity and reuse conditions — with reasons and risks stated.

Scenarios Covered

Structured RequirementsFunctional ArchitectureLogic ModuleProven Module LibraryInterface and Configuration ConstraintsReuse Gate

Customer Outcomes

Shorter Design CycleLess Duplicate DesignHigher StandardizationReuse Becomes an Asset
Organizational Capability AI+Talent

AI + Digital Workforce & Role Models

From a static file to a profile that updates as the business runs

Evidence is drawn continuously from real tasks, projects, training, performance, collaboration and exception handling, so employee and role profiles update with the business and talent decisions become explainable.

Scenarios Covered

Employee ProfileRole ModelCapability EvidencePerson–Role FitSuccession PlanningOrganizational Capability Analysis

Customer Outcomes

Explainable Talent IdentificationRole Requirements Stay CurrentCapability Gaps VisibleActionable Training Recommendations
Note:The above is a capability framework; actual scope, metrics and system integration are subject to project assessment. Customer names and specific system product names are withheld to protect customer information.

Wondering which path fits you?

Start with a 90-day closed loop: prove the value first, then talk about scale.

Book a Solution Session